Design and content validation of the Oral Hygiene Habits Scale.

  • Norma Idalia Rodríguez Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León.
  • José Moral Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León.


The presence of dental plaque is associated with deterioration of oral health, tooth decay, gingivitis and periodontal disease. The study of content validity of a new instrument aims to determine whether the items included in the measuring instrument are representative of the assessed construct. The objective of this research was to design and validate the content of an oral hygiene habits scale. A Likert-like scale, named Oral Hygiene Habits Scale (OHHS), containing 10 items and five response options on frequency of behavior, was developed to assess the dimensions of tooth brushing and flossing. Six experts were recruited for the study. They were asked to conduct their evaluations individually. Four characteristics (adequacy, clarity, consistency and relevance) were evaluated for each item, using an assessment scale of four ordinal values (from 1 = "does not meet the criteria" to 4 = "high level of compliance"). Data were analyzed using the binomial test, Kendall’s W and Fleiss’s Kappa coefficient. The judges mostly indicated a high level of compliance with the characteristics evaluated for each item and their judgments were consistent with one another. It is concluded that the OHHS composed of 10 items showed content validity. Further studies are suggested to determine its reliability and construct validity. 


1. Petersen PE, Kwan S. Evaluation of community based oral health promotion and oral disease prevention. WHO recommendations for improved evidence in public health practice. Community Dent Health. 2004; 21(Suppl 4): 319-29.
2. Van der Weijden FA, Slot DE. Efficacy of homecare regimens for mechanical
plaque removal in managing gingivitis -a meta review-. J Clin Periodontol. 2015; 42(Suppl 16): S77–91.
3. Gil SG, Morikava FS, Santin GC, Pintarelli TP, Fraiz FC, Ferreira FM. Reliability of self-reported toothbrushing frequency as an indicator for the assessment of oral hygiene in epidemiological research on caries in adolescents: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015; 15: 14.
4. Sambunjak D, Nickerson JW, Poklepovic T, Jhonson TM, Imai P, Tugwell P, Worthington HV. Flossing for the management of periodontal disease and dental caries in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (12): CD008829.
5. Kumar V, Agarwal V, Khatri M, Singh G, Sunny. Prevalence of periodontitis in rural and urban population. Indian J Comm Health. 2015; 27(3): 366‐71.
6. Prakash S, Yadav K. Dental caries: A Review. Asian Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2016; 6(53): 01-07.
7. Batista MJ, Perianes LBR, Hilgert JB, Hugo FN, Sousa MLR. The impacts of oral health on quality of life in working adults. Braz Oral Res. 2014; 28(1): 1-6.
8. American Dental Association. Mouth Healthy. [Internet]. 2016 [Accessed on May 27, 2016]. Available at:
9. Rosema NAM, Hennequin-Hoenderdos NL, Versteeg PA, Van Palenstein Helderman WH, Van der Velden U, Van der Weijden GA. Plaque-removing efficacy of new and used manual toothbrushes – a professional brushing study. Int J Dent Hygiene. 2013; 11(4): 237-43.
10. Zimmermann H, Zimmermann N, Hagenfeld D, Veile A, Kim TS, Becher H. Is frequency of tooth brushing a risk factor for periodontitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2015; 43(2): 116–27.
11. Pathak L. Tooth brushing with and without dentifrice - A comparative study
Bangladesh J Dent Res Educ. 2015; 5(1): 6-10.
12. Harnacke D, Winterfeld T, Erhardt J, Schlueter N, Ganss C, Margraf-Stiksrud J, Deinzer R. What is the best predictor for oral cleanliness after brushing? Results from an observational cohort study. J Periodontol. 2015; 86(1): 101-7.
13. Wolff A, Staehle HJ. Improving the mechanical properties of multiuse dental floss holders. Int J Dent Hyg. 2014; 12(4): 245–50.
14. Slots, J. Low cost periodontal therapy. Periodontol. 2000. 2012; 60(1):110-37.
15. Judah G, Gardner B, Aunger R. Forming a flossing habit: An exploratory study of the psychological determinants of habit formation. Br J Health Psychol. 2013; 18(2): 338–53.
16. Patiño-Marín N, Moreno-Álvarez SA, Loyola-Rodríguez JP, Martínez-Castañón GA, Leal-Tobías LA, Goldaracena-Azuara MP, Medina-Solís CA, Toro-Vázquez JF. Autorreporte de visitas al dentista y hábitos de higiene bucal en una población universitaria mexicana. Salud Pública Mex. 2012; 54(6): 563-65.
17. Al-Shammari KF, Al-Ansari JM, Al-Khabbaz AK, Dashti A, Honkala EJ. Self-Reported oral hygiene habits and oral health problems of Kuwaiti adults. Med Princ Pract. 2007; 16(1): 15–21.
18. Villa A, Kreimer AR, Polimeni A, Cicciu D, Strohmenger L, Gherlone E, et al. Self-reported oral hygiene habits among dental patients in Italy. Med Princ Pract. 2012; 21(5):452-6.
19. American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological tests. 3° ed. Washington: APA, AERA & NCME; 2014.
20. Aravena P. Investigar en odontología: ¿Estamos midiendo lo que realmente queremos medir? J Oral Res. 2014; 3(4): 207-08.
21. Geisinger KF. APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2013.
22. Escobar J, Cuervo A. Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización. Av Medición. 2008; 6(1): 27-36.
23. Alarcón AM, Muñoz NS. Medición en salud. Algunas consideraciones metodológicas. Rev Méd Chile. 2008; 136(1): 125-30.
24. Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 3° ed. New York: Wiley; 2003.
25. Gwet KL. Handbook of inter-rater reliability. 4° ed. Gaithersburg: Advanced Analytics, LLC; 2014.
26. Miaja M, Moral J. El significado psicológico de las cinco fases del duelo propuestas por Kübler-Ross mediante las redes semánticas naturales. Psicooncología. 2013; 10(1):109-30.
27. Van Sonderen E, Sanderman R, Coyne JC. Ineffectiveness of reverse wording of questionnaire items: Let’s learn from cows in the rain. PLoS One. 2013; 8(7): e68967.
28. Solís M. The dilemma of combining positive and negative items in scales. Psicothema. 2015; 27(2): 192-9.
29. Gouveia W, Lima TJSD, Gouveia RSV, Freires LA, Barbosa LHGM. Questionário de Saúde Geral (QSG-12): o efeito de itens negativos em sua estrutura fatorial. Cad Saúde Pública. 2012; 28(2): 375-84.
30. Varela M, Díaz L, García R. Descripción y usos del método Delphi en investigaciones del área de la salud. Inv Ed Med. 2012; 1(2):90-5.
31. Cortés E. De los acuerdos a los consensos. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2012; 40(2):134-6.
32. Gupta N, Vanishree N, Rao A, Sequeira P, Bullappa D, Naveen N. Assessment of the relationship among the oral health status, oral hygiene practices, and habits of school teachers in Mangalore city. J Indian Assoc Public Health Dent. 2015; 13: 274-9.
How to Cite
RODRÍGUEZ, Norma Idalia; MORAL, José. Design and content validation of the Oral Hygiene Habits Scale.. Journal of Oral Research, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 4, p. 159-167, june 2016. ISSN 0719-2479. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 23 oct. 2020. doi:


Oral Hygiene; Measurement Scale; Content Validity.

Most read articles by the same author(s)