The effects of composition, diameter and post-curing methods on the flexural properties of fiber posts.

  • Nadia Ereifej School of Dentistry, The University of Jordan, Amman.
  • Eugenio Jose Garcia School of Dentistry, Universitary Center UNINOVE, São Paulo.
  • Diego Noroña School of Dentistry, National University of Córdoba, Córdoba.
  • Rosa Helena Miranda Grande School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo.


Objective: This study evaluated the influence of fiber composition, diameter and post-curing treatments performed at relining on flexural strength and modulus of fiber-posts. Materials and methods: Sixty posts of Reforpost® Glass Fiber [GF]) and Reforpost® Carbon Fiber [CF] (Angelus, Londrina, PR, Brazil) with diameters of 1.0mm and 1.4mm were used. Each group was further subdivided into three subgroups (n=5) according to treatment received: dry-stored control group (C), oven-cured (Ov) or autoclaved (Ac). A universal testing machine measured flexural strength and modulus of all specimens. Results: Post composition and post-curing treatments had no significant effects on flexural properties of specimens while post diameter had significant effects (p< 0.05). The highest flexural strength and modulus (MPa) (1331±95.8 and 21532±1550, respectively) were obtained with Ov/GF/1.1, while lowest values (890±79.4 and 10675±952, respectively) were for Ac/GF/1.5. Conclusions: 1.1mm diameter posts had better mechanical properties than 1.5mm thick posts. Neither post composition nor post-curing procedures affected the mechanical properties of relined posts.


1. Goracci C, Ferrari M. Current perspectives on post systems: a literature review. Aust Dent J. 2011;56 (Suppl 1):77-83.
2. Lassila LV, Tanner J, Le Bell AM, Narva K, Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. Dent Mater. 2004;20:29-36.
3. Fernandes AS, Shetty S, Coutinho I. Factors determining post selection: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90:556-62.
4. Uzunoğlu E, Türker SA, Yilmaz Z. Influence of cement type and thickness on polyfiber post adhesion. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17(3):255-60.
5. Juloski J, Fadda GM, Monticelli F, Fajó-Pascual M, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Four-year Survival of Endodontically Treated Premolars Restored with Fiber Posts. J Dent Res. 2014;93(7 Suppl):52S-58S.
6. Gomes GM, Monte-Alto RV, Santos GO, Fai CK, Loguercio AD, Gomes O, Gomes JC, Reis A. Use of a Direct Anatomic Post in a Flared Root Canal: A Three-year Follow-up. Oper Dent. 2016;41(1):E23-8.
7. da Rosa RA, Bergoli CD, Kaizer OB, Valandro LF. Influence of cement thickness and mechanical cycling on the push-out bond strength between posts and root dentin. Gen Dent. 2011;59:e156-e61.
8. Bouschlicher MR, Rueggeberg FA, Wilson BM. Correlation of bottom-to-top surface microhardness and conversion ratios for a variety of resin composite compositions. Oper Dent. 2004;29:698-704.
9. Flury S, Hayoz S, Peutzfeldt A, Hüsler J, Lussi A. Depth of cure of resin composites: Is the ISO 4049 method suitable for bulk fill materials? Dent Mater. 2012;28:521-8.
10. Almeida-Chetti VA, Macchi RL, Iglesias ME. Effect of post-curing treatment on mechanical properties of composite resins. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2014;27(2):72-6.
11. Egilmez F, Ergun G, Cekic-Nagas I, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Short and long term effects of additional post curing and polishing systems on the color change of dental nano-composites. Dent Mater J. 2013;32(1):107-14.
12. Miyazaki CL, Medeiros IS, Matos JR, Rodriques-Filho LE. Thermal characterization of dental composites by TG/DTG and DSC. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2010;102:361-7.
13. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent. 2000;13(Spec No):15B-8.
14. Gbadebo OS, Ajayi DM, Oyekunle OO, Shaba PO. Randomized clinical study comparing metallic and glass fiber post in restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Indian J Dent Res. 2014;25(1):58-63.
15. Pereira JR, de Oliveira JA, do Valle AL, Zogheib LV, Ferreira PM, Bastos LG. Effect of carbon and glass fiber posts on the flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of a composite resin. Gen Dent. 2011;59:e144-8.
16. Novais VR, Versluis A, Correr-Sobrinho L, Soares CJ. Three-point bending testing of fibre posts: critical analysis by finite element analysis. Int Endod J. 2011;44:519-24.
17. Abdulmajeed AA, Narhi TO, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. The effect of high fiber fraction on some mechanical properties of unidirectional glass fiber-reinforced composite. Dent Mater. 2011;27:313-21.
18. Kim MJ, Jung WC, Oh S, Hattori M, Yoshinari M, Kawada E, Oda Y, Bae JM. Flexural properties of three kinds of experimental fiber-reinforced composite posts. Dent Mater J. 2011;30:38-44.
19. Stewardson DA, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. The effect of clinically relevant thermocycling on the flexural properties of endodontic post materials. J Dent. 2010;38:437-42.
20. Nguyen JF, Migonney V, Ruse ND, Sadoun M. Resin composite blocks via high-pressure high-temperature polymerization. Dent Mater. 2012;28(5):529-34.
21. Moraes AP, Sarkis-Onofre R, Moraes RR, Cenci MS, Soares CJ, Pereira-Cenci T. Can Silanization Increase the Retention of Glass-fiber posts? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of In Vitro Studies. Oper Dent. 2015;40(6):567-80.
How to Cite
EREIFEJ, Nadia et al. The effects of composition, diameter and post-curing methods on the flexural properties of fiber posts.. Journal of Oral Research, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 2, p. 71-76, mar. 2016. ISSN 0719-2479. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 07 july 2020. doi:


fiber-posts; composition; diameter; post-curing.