Survival rate of fixed space maintainers used in Dentistry. Systematic review and Meta-analysis.

  • Heber Arbildo-Vega Universidad San Martín de Porres. Chiclayo, Perú. Escuela de Odontología, Universidad Particular de Chiclayo. Chiclayo, Perú. Centro de Salud Odontológico San Mateo. Trujillo, Perú. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3689-7502
  • Jeniffer Cantu-Oliva Escuela de Odontología, Universidad Particular de Chiclayo. Chiclayo, Perú. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1477-2362
  • Rubén Chumpitaz-Durand Facultad de Odontología, Universidad San Martín de Porres. Chiclayo, Perú. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0699-6721
  • José Agüero-Alva Facultad de Odontología, Universidad San Martín de Porres. Chiclayo, Perú. Escuela de Odontología, Universidad Particular de Chiclayo. Chiclayo, Perú. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3955-3844
  • Alfredo Rendón-Alvarado Facultad de Odontología, Universidad San Martín de Porres. Chiclayo, Perú. Escuela de Odontología, Universidad Particular de Chiclayo. Chiclayo, Perú. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9772-4336
  • Hernán Vásquez-Rodrigo Facultad de Odontología, Universidad San Martín de Porres. Chiclayo, Perú. Escuela de Odontología, Universidad Particular de Chiclayo. Chiclayo, Perú. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5926-6837
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2021.072

Abstract

Objective: To determine, through a systematic review and meta-analysis, the survival rate of fixed space maintainers used in Dentistry. Material and Methods: A literature search was carried out, following the guidelines of the PRISMA standards, until March 2020, in the biomedical databases: Pubmed, Embase, Scielo, Science Direct, Scopus, SIGLE, LILACS, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Central Registry of Clinical Trials. The selection criteria of the studies were defined as: clinical trials, without language restriction, up to 10 years old and that report the survival rate of fixed space maintainers used in dentistry. Study risk of bias was analyzed using the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Results: The search strategy resulted in 159 articles, of which 10 were ultimately included for the present study. All included articles reported that the overall survival rate of the fixed space maintainers used in Dentistry was between 20% and 95%; the one with the highest survival rate is the crown and loop with 86.3%. When comparing the fiber-reinforced composite space maintainers with the band and loop it was observed that there is no difference between them; when comparing the crown and loop with the band and loop, a difference was observed, favoring the crown and loop. Conclusion: The reviewed literature suggests that the overall survival rate of fixed space maintainers used in dentistry ranges from 20 to 86.3% with a follow-up time of 6 to 18 months.

Author Biographies

Heber Arbildo-Vega, Universidad San Martín de Porres. Chiclayo, Perú. Escuela de Odontología, Universidad Particular de Chiclayo. Chiclayo, Perú. Centro de Salud Odontológico San Mateo. Trujillo, Perú.
 
Jeniffer Cantu-Oliva, Escuela de Odontología, Universidad Particular de Chiclayo. Chiclayo, Perú.
 
Rubén Chumpitaz-Durand, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad San Martín de Porres. Chiclayo, Perú.
 
José Agüero-Alva, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad San Martín de Porres. Chiclayo, Perú. Escuela de Odontología, Universidad Particular de Chiclayo. Chiclayo, Perú.
 
Alfredo Rendón-Alvarado, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad San Martín de Porres. Chiclayo, Perú. Escuela de Odontología, Universidad Particular de Chiclayo. Chiclayo, Perú.
 
Hernán Vásquez-Rodrigo, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad San Martín de Porres. Chiclayo, Perú. Escuela de Odontología, Universidad Particular de Chiclayo. Chiclayo, Perú.
 

References

[1]. Ramakrishnan M, Dhanalakshmi R, Subramanian EMG. Survival rate of different fixed posterior space maintainers used in Paediatric Dentistry - A systematic review. Saudi Dent J. 2019 Apr;31(2):165-172. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.02.037.

[2]. Murshid SA, Al-Labani MA, Aldhorae KA, Rodis OM. Prevalence of prematurely lost primary teeth in 5-10-year-old children in Thamar city, Yemen: A cross-sectional study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016 Aug;6(Suppl 2):S126-30. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.189739.

[3]. Lucas-Rincón SE, Robles-Bermeo NL, Lara-Carrillo E, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Pontigo-Loyola AP, Rueda-Ibarra V, Loyola-Rodríguez JP, Escoffié-Ramirez M, Medina-Solís CE. Interproximal caries and premature tooth loss in primary dentition as risk factors for loss of space in the posterior sector: A cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar;98(11):e14875. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014875.

[4}. López-Gómez SA, Villalobos-Rodelo JJ, Ávila-Burgos L, Casanova-Rosado JF, Vallejos-Sánchez AA, Lucas-Rincón SE, Patiño-Marín N, Medina-Solís CE. Relationship between premature loss of primary teeth with oral hygiene, consumption of soft drinks, dental care, and previous caries experience. Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 26;6:21147. doi: 10.1038/srep21147.

[5]. Feu D, Rosetti Lessa FC, Awad Barcellos L, Grillo CB, Freitas LA. Factors Associated with Premature Loss of Primary Teeth in Brazilian Children. J Dent Child (Chic). 2018 Sep 15;85(3):108-113. PMID: 30869586.

[6]. Ahamed SS, Reddy VN, Krishnakumar R, Mohan MG, Sugumaran DK, Rao AP. Prevalence of early loss of primary teeth in 5-10-year-old school children in Chidambaram town. Contemp Clin Dent. 2012 Jan;3(1):27-30. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.94542.

[7]. Al-Shahrani N, Al-Amri A, Hegazi F, Al-Rowis K, Al-Madani A, Hassan KS. The prevalence of premature loss of primary teeth and its impact on malocclusion in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Acta Odontol Scand. 2015;73(7):544-9. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2014.939709.

[8]. Monte-Santo AS, Viana SVC, Moreira KMS, Imparato JCP, Mendes FM, Bonini GAVC. Prevalence of early loss of primary molar and its impact in schoolchildren's quality of life. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018 Nov;28(6):595-601. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12416.

[9]. S Deshpande S, D Bendgude V, V Kokkali V. Survival of Bonded Space Maintainers: A Systematic Review. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018 Sep-Oct;11(5):440-445. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1554.

[10]. Watt E, Ahmad A, Adamji R, Katsimpali A, Ashley P, Noar J. Space maintainers in the primary and mixed dentition - a clinical guide. Br Dent J. 2018 Aug 24;225(4):293-298. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.650.

[11]. Ahmad AJ, Parekh S, Ashley PF. Methods of space maintenance for premature loss of a primary molar: a review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Oct;19(5):311-320. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0357-5.

[12]. Guideline on Management of the Developing Dentition and Occlusion in Pediatric Dentistry. Pediatr Dent. 2016 Oct;38(6):289-301. PMID: 27931468.

[13]. Urrútia G, Bonfill X. Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Med Clin (Barc). 2010; 135(11): 507-11. Doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2010.01.015.

[14]. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Colaboration, 2011. Available from: www.cochrane-handbook.org.

[15]. Potgieter N, Brandt PD, Mohamed N. Clinical evaluation of the loop-design fibre-reinforced composite and the band-and-loop space maintainers. S Afr Dent J. 2018; 73(7): 436 - 41.doi. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2519-0105/2018/v73no7a1

[16]. Mittal S, Sharma A, Sharma AK, Gupta KK, Gaur A, Pathania V. Banded versus Single-sided bonded space maintainers: A Comparative Study. Indian J Dent Sci. 2018; 10(1): 29-36. doi: 10.4103/IJDS.IJDS_76_17.

[17]. Eshghi A, Tayaran S, Mosleh H. The Longevity of Band and Loop and Pontic–Crown Fixed Space Maintainers in Children Aged 4 to 7 Years: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Dent Hypotheses 2018; 9(4): 90-5.

[18]. Kamal YM, Mohammed KN. Evaluation of Posterior Fixed Functional Space Maintainers Made of Fiber Reinforced Composite. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2017; 16(2): 1-5.

19. Qudeimat MA, Sasa IS. Clinical success and longevity of band and loop compared to crown and loop space maintainers. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015 Oct;16(5):391-6. doi:10.1007/s40368-015-0183-y.

[20]. Abdulhameed AM, Mahmood MAK, Ahmed AS. Evaluation of clinical success and survival rates of different types of space maintainers used in pediatric dentistry. J Adv Med Res. 2014; 4(4): 1-10.

[21]. Setia V, Kumar Pandit I, Srivastava N, Gugnani N, Gupta M. Banded vs Bonded Space Maintainers: Finding Better Way Out. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014 May;7(2):97-104. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1245.

[22]. Garg A, Samadi F, Jaiswal JN, Saha S. 'Metal to resin': a comparative evaluation of conventional band and loop space maintainer with the fiber reinforced composite resin space maintainer in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014 Apr-Jun;32(2):111-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.130783. PMID: 24739908.

[23]. Ghoname NA. Clinical evaluation of chairside band and loop space maintainers. Egypt Orthod J. 2013; 43(1): 91-104. doi: 10.21608/EOS.2013.78883

[24]. Tunc ES, Bayrak S, Tuloglu N, Egilmez T, Isci D. Evaluation of survival of 3 different fixed space maintainers. Pediatr Dent. 2012 Jul-Aug;34(4):e97-102. PMID: 23014081.
Published
2021-12-31
How to Cite
ARBILDO-VEGA, Heber et al. Survival rate of fixed space maintainers used in Dentistry. Systematic review and Meta-analysis.. Journal of Oral Research, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 6, p. 1-10, dec. 2021. ISSN 0719-2479. Available at: <https://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOralRes/article/view/joralres.2021.072>. Date accessed: 16 apr. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2021.072.
Citation Formats
Issue
Vol 10 No 6 (2021)
Section
Articles

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. © 2024.