Clinical Effectiveness of Pre-treatment with Chlorhexidine in Adhesive Dental Restorations. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

  • Heber Arbildo-Vega Facultad de Odontología, Universidad San Martín de Porres. Chiclayo – Perú. Escuela de Odontología, Universidad Particular de Chiclayo. Chiclayo – Perú. Centro de Salud Odontológico San Mateo. Trujillo – Perú. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3689-7502
  • Alfredo Rendón-Alvarado Facultad de Odontología, Universidad San Martín de Porres. Chiclayo – Perú. Escuela de Odontología, Universidad Particular de Chiclayo. Chiclayo – Perú. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9772-4336
  • Fredy Hugo Cruzado-Oliva Facultad de Estomatología, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo. Trujillo – Perú. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1575-0077
  • Edward Infantes-Ruíz Escuela de Odontología, Universidad Particular de Chiclayo. Chiclayo – Perú. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0613-1215
  • José Agüero-Alva Facultad de Odontología, Universidad San Martín de Porres. Chiclayo – Perú. Escuela de Odontología, Universidad Particular de Chiclayo. Chiclayo – Perú. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3955-3844
  • Hernán Vásquez-Rodrigo Facultad de Odontología, Universidad San Martín de Porres. Chiclayo – Perú. Escuela de Odontología, Universidad Particular de Chiclayo. Chiclayo – Perú. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5926-6837

Abstract

Objective: To determine, by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis, the clinical effectiveness of pre-treatment with chlorhexidine (CHX) in adhesive dental restorations. Material and Methods: A literature search was conducted until February 2020, in the biomedical databases: Pubmed, Embase, Scielo, Science Direct, Scopus, SIGLE, LILACS, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Central Registry of Clinical Trials. The selection criteria of the studies were defined, which were: randomized and controlled clinical trials, without language and time restrictions, and reporting the clinical effects (retention, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, postoperative sensitivity and secondary caries) of pre-CHX treatment in adhesive dental restorations. Study risk of bias was analyzed using the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Results: The search strategy resulted in six articles of which five entered a meta-analysis. The studies reported that there was no difference in retention, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, postoperative sensitivity, and secondary caries from pre-treatment with CHX in adhesive dental restorations. Conclusion: The reviewed literature suggests that pretreatment with CHX does not influence the clinical effectiveness in adhesive dental restorations.

References

[1]. Dionysopoulos D. Effect of digluconate chlorhexidine on bond strength between dental adhesive system and dentin: A systematic review. J Conserv Dent. 2016; 19(1): 11-6.

[2]. Rayar S, Sadasiva K, Singh P, Thomas P, Senthilkumar K, Jayasimharaj U. Effect of 2% chlorhexidine on resin bond strength and mode of failure using two diferent adhesives on dentin: an in vitro study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019; 11(Suppl 2): S325-30.

[3]. Da Silva EM, Glir DH, Gill AW, Giovanini AF, Furuse AY, Gonzaga CC. Effect of chlorhexidine on dentin bond strength of two adhesive systems after storage in different media. Braz Dent J. 2015; 26(6): 642-7.

[4]. Shadman N, Farzin-Ebrahimi S, Mortazavi-Lahijani E, Jalali Z. Effect of chlorhexidine on the durability of a new universal adhesive system. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018; 10(9): e921-6.

[5]. Hamdan-Nassar T, Bellot-Arcís C, Paredes-Gallardo V, García-Sanz V, Pascual-Moscardó A, Almerich-Silla JM, Montiel-Company JM. Effect of 2% Chlorhexidine Following Acid Etching on Microtensile Bond Strength of Resin Restorations: A Meta-Analysis. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019;55(12):769.

[6]. Gendron R, Grenier D, Sorsa T, Mayrand D. Inhibition of the activities of matrix metalloproteinases – 2, - 8 and – 9 by chlorhexidine. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1999; 6(3): 437-9.

[7]. Sinha DJ, Jaiswal N, Vasudeva A, Garg P, Tyagi SP, Chandra P. Comparative evaluation of the effect of chlorhexidine and Aloe barbadensis Miller (Aloe vera) on dentin stabilization using shear bond testing. J Conserv Dent. 2016; 19(5): 406-9.

[8]. Gunaydin Z, Yazici AR, Cehreli ZC. In vivo and in vitro effects of chlorhexidine pretreatment on immediate and aged dentin bond strengths. Oper Dent. 2016; 41(3): 258-67.

[9]. Karpinsky TN, Skaradkiewicz AK. Chlorhexidine-pharmaco biological activity and application. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015; 19(7): 1321-6.

[10]. Urrútia G, Bonfill X. Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Med Clin. 2010; 135(11): 507-11.

[11]. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org.

[12]. Galafassi D, Scatena C, Galo R, Curylofo-Zotti FA, Corona SAM, Borsatto MC. Clinical evaluation of composite restorations in Er: YAG laser-prepared cavities re-wetting with chlorhexidine. Clin Oral Investig. 2017; 21(4): 1231-41.

[13]. Favetti M, Schroeder T, Montagner AF, Correa MB, Pereira-Cenci T, Cenci MS. Effectiveness of pre-treatment with chlorhexidine in restoration retention: A 36-month follow-up randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2017; 60: 44-9.

[14]. Montagner AF, Perroni AP, Corrêa MB, Masotti AS, Pereira-Cenci T, Cenci MS. Effect of pre-treatment with chlorhexidine on the retention of restorations: a randomized controlled trial. Braz Dent J. 2015; 26(3): 234-41.

[15]. Sartori N, Stolf SC, Silva SB, Lopes GC, Carrilho M. Influence of chlorhexidine digluconate on the clinical performance of adhesive restorations: a 3-year follow-up. J Dent. 2013; 41(12): 1188-95.

[16]. Hajizadeh H, Ghavamnasiri M, Majidinia S. Randomized clinical evaluation of the effect of chlorhexidine on postoperative sensitivity of posterior composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int. 2013; 44(10): 793-8.

[17]. Dutra-Correa M, Saraceni CH, Ciaramicoli MT, Kiyan VH, Queiroz CS. Effect of chlorhexidine on the 18-month clinical performance of two adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2013; 15(3): 287-92.

[18]. Frassetto A, Breschi L, Turco G, Marchesi G, Di Lenarda R, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Cadenaro M. Mechanisms of degradation of the hybrid layer in adhesive dentistry and therapeutic agents to improve bond durability--A literature review. Dent Mater. 2016 Feb;32(2):e41-53.

[19]. Fonseca BM, Bresciani E, Pucci CR, Barcellos DC, Araújo MAM. Influence of chlorhexidine on longitudinal bond strength to dentin: In vitro study. Braz Dent Sci. 2017; 20: 17–24.

[20]. Zheng P, Zaruba M, Attin T, Wiegand A. Effect of different matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors on microtensile bond strength of an etch-and-rinse and a self-etching adhesive to dentin. Oper. Dent. 2015; 40(1):80–6.

[21]. Kusdemir M, Çetin AR, Özsoy A, Toz T, Bozkurt FO, Özcan M. Does 2% chlorhexidine digluconate cavity disinfectant or sodium fluoride/hydroxyethyl methacrylate affect adhesión of universal adhesive to dentin? J Adhes Sci Technol. 2016; 30: 13–23.
Published
2021-06-30
How to Cite
ARBILDO-VEGA, Heber et al. Clinical Effectiveness of Pre-treatment with Chlorhexidine in Adhesive Dental Restorations. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.. Journal of Oral Research, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 3, p. 1-10, june 2021. ISSN 0719-2479. Available at: <https://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOralRes/article/view/joralres.2021.034>. Date accessed: 28 mar. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2021.034.
Section
Reviews