Validation of the Oral Health Impact Profile in Spanish for Paraguayan adults (OHIP-14Py).

Clarisse Díaz-Reissner; Juan Roldán-Merino; Irma Casas García

doi:10.17126/joralres.2020.069

Clarisse Díaz-Reissner Facultad de Odontología. Universidad Nacional de Asunción. Asunción, Paraguay.
Juan Roldán-Merino Sant Joan de Déu-Fundació Privada. Barcelona, Spain. | Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Barcelona, Spain. | Rovira i Virgili University of Tarragona.Tarragona, Spain. | Research Group GEIMAC, Barcelona, Spain.
Irma Casas García Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona. Departamento de Pediatría, Obstetricia y Ginecología y Medicina Preventiva. Barcelona, Spain. | Preventive Medicine Service. Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol. Barcelona, Spain. | Research Group Innovation in Respiratory Infections and Tuberculosis Diagnosis (Group Consolidat 2017 SGR 494).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2020.069

Abstract

Objetive: The objective of this study was to culturally adapt and validate the short version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) instrument into Spanish for use by Paraguayan adults who attended dental clinics. Material and methods: The design was a cross-sectional observational study based on Classical Test Theory (CTT). The original English language version was subjected to a forward-backward translation processes; a calibration of the examiners and pilot test were performed. The questionnaire was applied by dentists through interviews; the same dentists also made the oral examination. The dimensionality of the questionnaire was evaluated using Confirmatory Factorial Analysis (CFA). The total and item-total internal consistencies were evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha. To evaluate the discriminating validity, the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used. Spearman’s correlation analysis was used to measure convergent validity for total-dimension, self-assessment of oral health, and dental caries experience index with the DMFT Index. Results: Three-hundred-thirty-three patients participated in the study. The CFA indicates the Paraguayan’s OHIP (OHIP-14Py) is considered a multi-dimensional instrument. The Cronbach’s alpha values were appropriate for both the total (α=0.061) and for item total (α=0.80) correlation. The OHIP-14Py discriminated for the variable self-perception of oral health (p=0.001), symptoms of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) (p=0.026), need of upper dental prosthesis (p=0.001), need of lower dental prosthesis (p=0.001), and ≥20 teeth healthy (p=0.001). For measuring convergent validity, all coefficients of correlation were statistically significant (p=0.001). Conclusion: The OHIP-14Py is a reliable and valid questionnaire for the evaluation of oral health-related quality of life in Paraguayan adults.

References

1. Federation World Dental. The challenge of oral disease. A call for global action [Internet]. 2th Ed. Miryad, editor. Brighton; 2015.
2. Müller F, Shimazaki Y, Kahabuka F, Schimmel M. Oral health for an ageing population: the importance of a natural dentition in older adults. Int Dent J. 2017;67:7-13.
3. Glick M, Williams DM, Kleinman D V, Vujicic M, Watt RG, Weyant RJ. Reprint of: A new definition for oral health supported by FDI opens the door to a universal definition of oral health. J Dent. 2017;57:1-3.
4. Reissmann DR. Alignment of oral health-related with health-related quality of life assessment. J Prosthodont Res. 2016;60:69-71.
5. Locker D, Allen P. Assessment of oral health quality of life. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1(1):40.
6. Slade G. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997;25(4):284-90.
7. Alzoubi EE. Oral Health Related Quality of Life Impact in Dentistry. J Dent Heal Oral Disord Ther. 2017;6(6):00221.
8. Gregory J. Boyle, Donald H. Saklofske GM. Criteria for Selection and Evaluation of Scales and Measures. En: Gregory J. Boyle, Donald H. Saklofske GM, editor. Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs. Academic Press; 2015.
9. Haag DG, Peres KG, Balasubramanian M, Brennan DS. Oral Conditions and Health-Related Quality of Life: A Systematic Review. J Dent Res. 2017;96(8):864-74.
10. Yeh D-Y, Kuo H-C, Yang Y-H, Ho P-S. The Responsiveness of Patients’ Quality of Life to Dental Caries Treatment—A Prospective Study. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0164707.
11. Niesten D, Van Mourik K, Van Der Sanden S. The impact of having natural teeth on the QoL of frail dentulous older people. A qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:839.
12. Guevara-Canales J-O, Morales-Vadillo R, Sacsaquispe-Contreras S-J, Alberca-Ramos D-E, Morgenstern-Orezzoli H, Cava-Vergiu C-E. Association Between Self-Perceived Oral Health and Clinical Indicators. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2018;16(1):1-9.
13. Javidi H, Benson P. The impact of malocclusion and its treatment on the oral health related quality of life of adults, assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). Evid Based Dent. 2015;16(2):57-8.
14. Sanabria-Castellanos CM, Suárez-Robles MA, Estrada-Montoya JH. Relación entre determinantes socioeconómicos, cobertura en salud y caries dental en veinte países. Rev Gerenc y Políticas Salud. 2015;14(28):161-89.
15. Caballero García CR, Flores Alatorre JF, Arenas Monreal L. Salud bucodental relacionada a la calidad de vida: revisión crítica de los instrumentos de medición. Mem Inst Investig Cienc Salud. 2017;15(2):108-17.
16. Slade GD. The Oral health Impact Profile. En: Slade GD, editor. Measuring Oral Health and Quality of Life. University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill; 1996: 93-104.
17. Kegler K, Méndez M, Segovia B. Impacto de la salud bucal sobre la calidad de vida de los niños de 11 a 14 años de tres escuelas nacionales de Asunción. Rev salud publica Parag. 2017;7(1):17-20. 4
18. Díaz-Reissner CV, Pérez-Bejarano NM, Ferreira-Gaona MI, Sanabria-Vázquez DA, Torres-Amarilla CD, Araujo A, Fernández B, Fleitas D, Real C, Godoy J, Páez E. Autopercepción de la calidad de vida relacionada con salud oral en adultos mayores residentes en albergues nacionales del área metropolitana, Paraguay. Rev Odontol Latinoam. 2015;7(1):23-31.
19. WHO. Oral health surveys: basic methods. 5th Ed. Genova: WHO; 2013.
20. Colavida JMR, de Dios TR, Calvo JCL, SalazarFS, Osés JA, Andrés VLG, García-Camba de la Muela JM.Criterios minimos de los estudios epidemiológicos de salud dental en escolares. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 1997;71(3):231-42.
21. Holtfreter B, Alte D, Schwahn C, Desvarieux M, Kocher T. Effects of different manual periodontal probes on periodontal measurements. J Clin Periodontol. 2012;39(11):1032-41.
22. Szende A, Oppe M, Devlin NJ, editores. EQ-5D value sets: inventory, comparative review, and user guide. Dordrecht: Springer; 2007
23. Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 4th ed. Gilford Press, editor. New York; 2011.
24. Sousa PCB de, Mendes FM, Imparato JCP, Ardenghi TM. Differences in responses to the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP14) used as a questionnaire or in an interview. Braz Oral Res. 2009;23(4):358-64.
25. León S, Correa-Beltrán G, De Marchi RJ, Giacaman RA. Ultra-short version of the oral health impact profile in elderly Chileans. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016;17:277-85.
26. John MT, Feuerstahler L, Waller N, Baba K, Larsson P, Celebić A, Kende D, Rener-Sitar K, Reissmann DR. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Oral Health Impact Profile. J Oral Rehabil. 2014;41(9):644-52.
27. Balci N, Alkan N, Gurgan C. Psychometric properties of a Turkish version of the oral health impact profile-14. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017;20(1):19.
28. Batra M, Aggarwal V, Shah A, Gupta M. Validation of Hindi version of oral health impact profile-14 for adults. J Indian Assoc Public Heal Dent. 2015;13(4):469.
29. Fernandes MJ, Ruta DA, Ogden GR, Pitts NB, Ogston SA. Assessing oral health-related quality of life in general dental practice in Scotland: validation of the OHIP-14. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006;34(1):53-62.
30. Montero-Martín J, Bravo-Pérez M, Albaladejo-Martínez A, Hernández-Martín LA, Rosel-Gallardo EM. Validation of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14sp) for adults in Spain. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009;14(1):44-50.
31. Papagiannopoulou V, Oulis CJ, Papaioannou W, Antonogeorgos G, Yfantopoulos J. Validation of a Greek version of the oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) for use among adults. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10:7.
32. Ravaghi V, Farrahi-Avval N, Locker D, Underwood M. Validation of the Persian short version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). Oral Health Prev Dent. 2010;8(3):229-35.
33. Oliveira B, Nadanovsky P. Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile-short form. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2005;33(4):307-14.
34 Slusanschia O, Morarub R, Garneatac L, Mircescud G, Cuculescue M, Preoteasaf E. Validation of a Romanian version of the short form of the oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) for use in an Urban adult population. Oral Heal Prev Dent. 2013;11(3):235-42.
35. Khalifa N, F. Allen P, H. Abu-bakr N, E. Abdel-Rahman M. Psychometric properties and performance of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14s-ar) among Sudanese adults. J Oral Sci. 2013;55(2):123-32.
36. Kushnir D, Zusman SP, Robinson PG. Validation of a Hebrew Version of the Oral Health Impact Profile 14. J Public Health Dent. 2004;64(2):71-5.
37. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ. 1997;314(7080):572.
38. Carretero-Dios H, Pérez C. Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales: consideraciones sobre la selección de tests en la investigación psicológica. Int J Clin Heal Psychol. 2007;7(3):863–882.
39. Soriano Rodríguez AM. Diseño y validación de instrumentos de medición. Diálogos. 2015;8(13):19-40.
40. Brennan DS. Oral Health Impact Profile, EuroQol, and Assessment of Quality of Life instruments as quality of life and health-utility measures of oral health. Eur J Oral Sci. 2013;121(3 PART1):188-93.
41. Lawrence HP, Thomson WM, Broadbent JM, Poulton R. Oral health-related quality of life in a birth cohort of 32-year olds. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2008;36(4):305-16.
42. Robinson PG, Gibson B, Khan FA, Birnbaum W. Validity of two oral health-related quality of life measures. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003;31(2):90-9.