Temporary restorative treatment in children and adolescents with amelogenesis imperfecta: Scoping review.
AbstractBackground: Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) is a group of disorders that affect the enamel of the teeth, either in quality or quantity. This alteration causes sensitivity and is associated with factors that could affect the strength of the adhesive bond of the restorative material. Aim: To review the literature regarding the most used temporary restorative treatment in children and adolescents with AI. Methods: This scoping review aimed to include case reports, literature reviews and original studies that evaluated restorative materials for the teeth of children and adolescents with AI. Editorials, meeting abstracts and letters to the editor were excluded. The following electronic databases were used: Medline (Ovid), PubMed, Ebsco, Scopus (Elsevier) and Web of Science (Thomson Reuters). Manual searches in the reference lists of the included articles were also carried out. Finally, a search in Google Scholar restricted to the first 100 hits was performed. Duplicates were eliminated upon identification. The search covered a period between the years of 2011 and 2016. PRISMA guidelines were used for reporting the review. The evidence ranking was carried out by means of the Oxford criteria. Results: Six articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in this scoping review. Three articles were case reports, one was a review and two were original studies. For the treatment of AI, direct or indirect composite resins were the most commonly used material of choice in the retrieved studies because they demonstrate greater longevity, aesthetics and function compared to the other materials used. Conclusions: Among children and adolescents with AI, the temporary restorative treatment that demonstrated better long-term results in permanent teeth was the direct and indirect composite resins. However, high quality studies should be conducted to confirm the results presented herein.
2. Patil PG, Patil SP. Amelogenesis imperfecta with multiple impacted teeth and skeletal class III malocclusion: complete mouth rehabilitation of a young adult. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111(1):11–5.
3. Chen CF, Hu JC, Estrella MR, Peters MC, Bresciani E. Assessment of restorative treatment of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta. Pediatr Dent. 2013;35(4):337–42.
4. Pousette Lundgren G, Dahllöf G. Outcome of restorative treatment in young patients with amelogenesis imperfecta. a cross-sectional, retrospective study. J Dent. 2014;42(11):1382–9.
5. Kumar S, Saran R. Rehabilitation of teeth affected by amelogenesis imperfecta in mixed dentition period. Natl J Int Res Med. 2011;3(2):169–72.
6. Chauhan D, Sharma KR, Chauhan T. Restoration of function and esthetics in a patient with amelogenesis imperfecta. Int J Stud Res. 2013;3(1):20–2.
7. Ardu S, Duc O, Krejci I, Perroud R. Amelogenesis imperfecta: a conservative and progressive adhesive treatment concept. Oper Dent. 2013;38(3):235–41.
8. Gadhia K, McDonald S, Arkutu N, Malik K. Amelogenesis imperfecta: an introduction. Br Dent J. 2012;212(8):377–9.
9. Martín-González J, Sánchez-Domínguez B, Tarilonte-Delgado ML, Castellanos-Cosano L, Llamas-Carreras JM, López-Frías FJ, Segura-Egea JJ. Anomalías y displasias dentarias de origen genético-hereditario. Av Odontoestomatol. 2012;28(6):287–301.
10. Bailleul-Forestier I, Molla M, Verloes A, Berdal A. The genetic basis of inherited anomalies of the teeth. Part 1: clinical and molecular aspects of non-syndromic dental disorders. Eur J Med Genet. 2008;51(4):273–91.
11. Witkop CJ Jr. Amelogenesis imperfecta, dentinogenesis imperfecta and dentin dysplasia revisited: problems in classification. J Oral Pathol. 1988;17(9-10):547–53.
12. Sudhapalli S, Sudhapalli SK, Bharathi S, Sharma N. Treatment Of Amelogenesis Imperfecta: A Literature Review. Indian J Dent Sci. 2014;6(5):113–5.
13. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):W65–95.
14. Every-Palmer S, Howick J. How evidence-based medicine is failing due to biased trials and selective publication. J Eval Clin Pract. 2014;20(6):908–14.
15. Kumar S, Runki S. Rehabilitation of teeth affected by amelogenesis imperfecta in mixed dentition period. Natl J Integr Res Med. 2012;3(2):169–72.
16. Pousette Lundgren G, Dahllöf G. Outcome of restorative treatment in young patients with amelogenesis imperfecta. a cross-sectional, retrospective study. J Dent. 2014;42(11):1382–9.
17. Dashash M, Yeung CA, Jamous I, Blinkhorn A. Interventions for the restorative care of amelogenesis imperfecta in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;6:CD007157.
18. Abreu LG, Melgaço CA, Bastos Lages EM, Paiva SM. Impact of malocclusion on adolescents’ oral health-related quality of life. Gen Dent. 2016;64(6):e1–e5.
19. Abreu LG, Melgaço CA, Abreu MH, Lages EM, Paiva SM. Agreement between adolescents and parents/caregivers in rating the impact of malocclusion on adolescents’ quality of life. Angle Orthod. 2015;85(5):806–11.
20. Abreu LG, Melgaço CA, Abreu MH, Lages EM, Paiva SM. Perception of parents and caregivers regarding the impact of malocclusion on adolescents’ quality of life: a cross-sectional study. Dental Press J Orthod. 2016;21(6):74–81.
21. Abreu LG, Melgaço CA, Abreu MH, Lages EM, Paiva SM. Effect of malocclusion among adolescents on family quality of life. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015;16(4):357–63.
22. Coffield KD, Phillips C, Brady M, Roberts MW, Strauss RP, Wright JT. The psychosocial impact of developmental dental defects in people with hereditary amelogenesis imperfecta. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136(5):620–30.
23. Pousette Lundgren G, Karsten A, Dahllöf G. Oral health-related quality of life before and after crown therapy in young patients with amelogenesis imperfecta. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:197.
24. Elhennawy K, Schwendicke F. Managing molar-incisor hypomineralization: A systematic review. J Dent. 2016;55:16–24.
25. Levin KA. Study design VII. Randomised controlled trials. Evid Based Dent. 2007;8(1):22–3.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. © 2023.