Prevalence of hypercementosis in a Saudi Arabian population: A cone beam computed tomography study.
AbstractObjective: To determine the prevalence of hypercementosis in a Saudi Arabian population. Material and methods: A total of 642 CBCT scans from patients comprising 4471 teeth were incorporated in the study sample. All teeth were analyzed for the presence of hypercementosis in sagittal, axial and coronal plains by two qualified and experienced observers. The characteristics of the involved tooth in terms of gender, jaw and location were recorded from the CBCT scans. The obtained data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 21.0. The reliability of measurements was evaluated by kappa statistics. Results: Out of total 642 subjects hypercementosis was observed in 31 patients (4.82%) and 43 teeth (0.96%). Eight (2.68%) maxillary 1st molars, 6 (1.88%) mandibular 1st molars, 5 (1.46%) maxillary second molars, 7 (1.95%) mandibular 2nd molars, 9 (4.76%) maxillary 3rd molars and 8 (3.58%) mandibular 3rd molars were observed to have hypercementosis. Among males, 4.76% were affected with hypercementosis as compared to 4.86% of females (p=0.97). Likewise, no significant difference in the occurrence of hypercementosis was observed between maxillary and mandibular arches or between sides (p>0.05). Conclusion: The prevalence of hypercementosis in a Saudi population was found to be 4.82% with respect to patients and 0.96% with respect to teeth. No significant propensity for gender, jaw and arch side was noted.
2. Jeddy N, T R, C K, R S, Prabakar R. Localized multiple cemental excrescences: a rare presentation of hypercementosis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(5):ZD16–7.
3. Pinto AS, Carvalho MS, de Farias AL, da Silva Firmino B, da Silva Dias LP, Neto JM, da Silva AM, Castro FA, Costa AL, De Castro Lopes SL. Hypercementosis: Diagnostic imaging by radiograph, cone-beam computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. J Oral Maxillofac Radiol. 2017;5:90–3.
4. Zhou J, Zhao YF, Xia CY, Jiang L. Periodontitis with hypercementosis: report of a case and discussion of possible aetiologic factors. Aust Dent J. 2012;57(4):511–4.
5. Vaezi T, Salehinejad J, Darijani M, Ebrahimnejad H, Darijani J, Nazeri M, Vakili M. Co-occurrence of Calcifying Odontogenic Cyst, Aggressive Central Giant Cell Granuloma and Central Odontogenic Fibroma: Report of a Very Rare Entity and Its Surgical Management. J Dent Mater Tech. 2016;5(3):153–7.
6. Mohan B. Hypercementosis and concrescence of maxillary second molar with third molar: a case report and review of literature. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2014;13(2):558–61.
7. Patil SR, Yadav N. Generalized hypercementosis with multiple missing teeth in a young female: A rare case report. Int J Health Allied Sci. 2015;4(3):178–80.
8. Eren Y, Erdal O, Serdar B, Emin K, Enes G. Evaluation of the frequency and characteristics of hypercementosis in the turkish population with cone-beam computed tomography. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017;20(6):724–8.
9. Bürklein S, Jansen S, Schäfer E. Occurrence of hypercementosis in a German population. J Endod. 2012;38(12):1610–2.
10. Corruccini RS, Jacobi KP, Handler JS, Aufderheide AC. Implications of tooth root hypercementosis in a Barbados slave skeletal collection. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1987;74:179–84.
The copyright of all the articles published in the J Oral Res. belongs to the Universidad de Concepción, Chile. All information about theJ Oral Res. is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 and must be cited correctly.